Facebook Pixel
For law firms

Win the client who asks AI first

People research their legal problem long before they call a firm. The AI answer they get names a few sources — and that shapes who they believe is the authority worth paying.

3-day free trialCard verified, not chargedSetup in 5 minutes
Real prompts in Legal

This is what your buyers ask — before they ever reach you

do I need a lawyer for thishow much does a divorce costGwhat are my rights after terminationhow long do I have to file a claimdo I need a lawyer for thishow much does a divorce costwhat are my rights after terminationhow long do I have to file a claim
best employment lawyer in my citywhat happens at a first consultationcan I handle this without a solicitoris this contract clause enforceablebest employment lawyer in my cityGwhat happens at a first consultationcan I handle this without a solicitoris this contract clause enforceable

Right now, AI answers name brands like these

These are well-known names AI engines commonly surface in legal. They are shown as competitive context — not as Proparlab customers. The question worth answering is simple: when a buyer asks, does your brand appear beside them?

LegalZoomClioFindLawRocket LawyerLegalZoomClioFindLawRocket Lawyer
JustiaNoloLawRatoAvvoJustiaNoloLawRatoAvvo
What actually happens

One question, and a shortlist you are not on

This is the whole problem in one screen. A buyer asks, the assistant answers with three or four names, and that is the shortlist — whether or not you rank first on Google.

Today
A buyer asks
do I need a lawyer for this
The assistant answers with
LegalZoomClioFindLaw
Your brand is not mentioned
After a page that answers it
Same question
do I need a lawyer for this
Now answered with
Your brandLegalZoomClio
Cited, and measured — see below

Why Legal loses in AI search

The failure modes here are specific. Generic SEO advice does not address them.

Directories own your expertise

Legal directories and content mills answer the questions your partners could answer far better — and they get the citation because they actually published the answer.

Practice-area pages say nothing

"We advise on employment law" is not an answer. Models cite pages that state process, timelines and cost ranges plainly.

Jurisdiction gets flattened

Legal answers are jurisdiction-specific, but generic content collapses that nuance. Firms that publish jurisdiction-explicit answers get cited for the right queries.

See it working

Every answer, every engine, tracked daily

We ask the questions your buyers ask, on every engine, and record what came back — who was named, which sources were quoted, and where you sat in the list.

High
Value per acquired client
Approval
Required before any page publishes
Per country
Jurisdiction-aware visibility tracking
Your domain
Every page lives on your site

How you get recommended

Measure where you stand, publish the answer buyers are looking for, then make sure it gets crawled.

01
Track client-intent questions

Monitor the questions prospective clients actually ask in your practice areas, and see which firm or directory the AI names.

02
Publish authoritative answers

Turn each practice-area question into a clear, jurisdiction-aware page on your own site — reviewed and approved by a fee earner before it publishes.

03
Get insight pages found

Push new articles and case commentary to search and AI engines immediately, so timely commentary is actually timely.

Legal content carries professional-conduct obligations. Every page is drafted, quality-checked, then held for a qualified reviewer to approve — publishing is always your decision.

Tracked across every answer engine
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGoogle AI OverviewGoogle AI ModeBing Copilot
Proof, not a hunch

You will know which page did it

We compare the fortnight before a page published against the fortnight after, on the exact question it targets — and set that against every other prompt you track, so a general rise is never mistaken for your work.

Published pages with citation rate before and after, a control column, and a lift figure in percentage points
The third row is a page that did nothing. Showing it is the point — a tool that hid that column would be flattering you rather than informing you.
Pricing

Start on the plan that fits, move when it works

Every plan tracks AI visibility and publishes GEO pages. These are launch prices — keep the rate you sign up on.

Starter
Solo founders & first-time GEO users
$72/mo$91Save 20%
$869 billed yearly · 1 month free

See where you stand in AI answers, and start publishing pages that get cited.

  • 50 prompts tracked
  • 2 AI engines
  • 25 keywords, 3 competitors
  • 15 AI-written GEO pages a month
  • 1 project
  • AI crawler tracking
Start 3-day free trialOr skip the trial and start today
Most popular
Growth
Growing brands & in-house marketers
$166/mo$208Save 20%
$1,990 billed yearly · 2 months free

More questions, more content, more brands — built for a marketing team.

  • 150 prompts tracked
  • 3 AI engines
  • 75 keywords, 5 competitors
  • 40 AI-written GEO pages a month
  • 2 projects
  • Priority email + chat support
Start 3-day free trialOr skip the trial and start today
Scale
Multi-brand teams & agencies
$374/mo$499Save 25%
$4,490 billed yearly · 2 months free

Everything, plus unlimited instant indexing across Google, Bing and the AI crawlers.

  • 350 prompts tracked
  • All 6 AI engines
  • 200 keywords, 10 competitors
  • 100 AI-written GEO pages a month
  • Unlimited instant indexing
  • Phone + dedicated onboarding
Start 3-day free trialOr skip the trial and start today

Managing legal brands for clients? See agency pricing.

Case study

How Garniche went from 1K to 230K daily visits

By getting 80,000+ pages indexed across Google, Bing and AI search — and ranking for 9,000+ AI queries — in just three months with Proparlab.

Read the full case study →
1K → 230K
Daily visits in 3 months
80,000+
Pages indexed on Google, Bing & AI
9,000+
Keywords ranking in AI search
3 months
From launch to scale

Legal: questions, answered

Is publishing AI-drafted legal content a risk?

It would be, unsupervised. Nothing publishes without a human approving it, and you should treat every draft as needing a fee earner's review for jurisdictional accuracy before it goes live. Used that way it removes the blank page, not the lawyer.

Does this conflict with our marketing rules?

You keep full editorial control — pages sit in an approval queue on your own dashboard, so your compliance process applies exactly as it does today.

Can we target a specific jurisdiction?

Yes. Tracking runs per country, and generated pages take your market and jurisdiction as context.

See where you stand in Legal AI answers.

Start your free trial and get your first visibility report in minutes.